ssp logo


Recent Posts

Wrong figures in tax plan attack


Site Feed

SSP News Site Feed to view in your newsreader.


Radio SSP

Radio SSP: streaming internet radio



Search the Web
Search SSP News



Photos

justice for gordon gentle demo

Justice for Gordon Gentle Demo 30.10.2004

calton hill rally photos

Rally for an Independent Scottish Republic, Calton Hill 9.10.2004

nursery nurses demonstrate

Nursery Nurses Demonstrate 29.3.04

Anti Bush Demo, Edinburgh 19.09.03

SSP at Paris ESF demo

SSP at European Social Forum, Nov 2003 Paris | European Social Forum Demonstration

Socialism 2003 Pictures

Shut Down Dungavel demo 6.9.03

Anti-War demo at Scottish Parliament, March 6th

Pictures of February 15th Anti-War Demo, Glasgow

Pictures of February 15th Anti-War Demo, Glasgow

Pictures from the European Social Forum, Florence 2002

Anti-War Demo Glasgow 19th October 2002

Pictures of Sept 28th 2002 "Don't Attack Iraq" demo


Archives

SSP News Archives


Links

SSP Website
Scottish Socialist Voice
Scrap Prescription Charges
Scrap the Council Tax
Join the SSP
Local SSP Branches

Powered By Blogger TM

This site aims to comply with web standards and to be accessible for all. Thanks to glish.com. Best viewed in a browser that complies with web standards.

Thursday, September 08, 2005

Wrong figures in tax plan attack

Press Associatiation report
A Labour attack on plans to scrap council tax backfired after the party used inaccurate figures in an attempt to criticise the move.

The party used the examples to claim the new charges would cost people more than council tax but failed to take account of the first £10,000 being tax free.
Under the Bill, which is currently being scrutinised by Holyrood's Local Government Committee, a salary of £17,600 would in fact cost that taxpayer £342 and £297 for someone on a salary of £16,600.
A spokesman for the Scottish Socialist Party said: "If Labour can't even understand the basics of progressive taxation then they're not in a position to criticise the Scottish service tax proposals."
A Labour spokesman said the figures were a mistake made by a party researcher which should not have happened.